Beyond Money?

Lately I've been playing a good amount of Star Trek Online; this has me thinking about Star Trek stuff. I've also started reading The Bible fairly regularly again (okay, just for two nights now, but still). I've also had a good amount of time alone with my thoughts on crawlspace jobs, wood treatment with Timbor, hanging insulation, etc. I'm also listening to J-Pop right now; actually, that has nothing do do with this. At any rate, I ended up thinking about precisely what various individuals in the Star Trek universe (particularly Jean Luc Picard, but I think there may have been others, as well) meant when they said that the humans of the Federation had advanced “beyond money.”

One scripture that has been foremost in my thoughts as I've worked on this job is something from one of the letters—Paul's, I think (this is one reason I've gone back to reading... I kind of want to rediscover where I first read many of rhe pasages that float about in my head, and whether I recall them correctly)—in which the writer exhorts his readers to do anything they do as if they were doing it for God himself. I try to worry only about my own performance, and not about whether I might be being taken advantage of, whether I'm being paid enough for the effort I'm putting out, whether I am working reasonably or above and beyond, whether or not my current employer can be expected to recognize my efforts, etc. I've also been thinking about some of the spiritual effects—in this lifetime—of keeping up a regular tithe and such (whether officially, to a Church or some such organization, or just personally, setting aside a percentage of one's gross earnings for donation to various worthy causes).

One conclusion I've come to is that, despite the potential financial costs of both “working for God” (in the sense of potentially reducing leisure and “giving too much” for too little) and some form of tithe (direct financial cost, of course), one thing it does do is keep one working harder than one otherwise would. “Working for God” has its obvious effect, but a regular tithe is of particular interest to me. I know savings make me lazy; if I've got a sizable amount saved up and accessible, I have a tendency to be very lazy about looking for another job. A tithe, on the other hand, particularly if it cuts deeply enough into my cash flow to force me to economize and keeps me on my toes in terms of labor, it provides me with a cash flow that's normally not accessed by me, but can still be tapped in the event of a financial emergency. If it's acceptable for not-yet-King David to eat the bread normally reserved for priests when he and his men are on the march and hungry, and its acceptable to rescue an animal on the Sabbath (Jesus said both were okay), then it is acceptable to tap one's tithe one pay period if absolutely necessary.

The effect of all this is that in the process of working harder than one would naturally, one develops endurance, skill, confidence, and other intangible personal qualities faster, and to a greater degree, than one ordinarily would. When one has these things, one doesn't need to worry so much about money; one's personal qualities ensure that opportunities will be found and utilized easier, with jobs more easily landed, and so on Indeed, I ran across Jesus' direct statement in a similar direction last night (Matthew 6:25-34). Which leads me back to Star Trek: I believe it was Jake Sisko who informed the Ferrengi Nog that the humans of that era were more interested in personal improvement than in money—in accumulating intangible personal qualities rather than physical goods.

For certainly, the world of Star Trek is not a post-scarcity economy. One of the missions of the first Enterprise was the discovery and securing of sources of various minerals, particularly dilithium crystals. I believe it was Ben Sisko who spoke of spending all his transporter credits visiting his father's restaurant (or something like that) when he was in the Academy. The idea of using credits for rationing things like holodeck privileges was not a foreign concept to the Voyager crew when they found themselves far beyond their supply lines. But a central (particularly a centrally managed) currency seems to be largely absent from the Federation's economy. So how do they coordinate production and set priorities of we're prepared to reject the “communist paradise” paradigm? Perhaps they use some kind of high tech barter system instead of a single central currency? ;)

But I digress. The point I am trying to make is that personal improvement is more important than the accumulation of things. Things can be taken; things can be lost. I just heard a story on NPR about some woman who lost her life savings to Bernie Madoff's scheme and suffered a renewing of old fears of becoming a bag lady as a result. But personal qualities, barring a major head injury (and even then, relationships serve better than wealth to keep one secure), cannot be lost or taken. “Do not store up treasures for yourselves on earth, where moth and woodworm destroy them and thieves can break in and steal. But store up treasures for yourselves in heaven, where neither moth nor woodworm destroys them and thieves cannot break in and steal. For wherever your treasure is, there your heart there will your heart be too” (Matthew 6:19-21, New Jerusalem Bible).

On God: Why I Believe

Something I always struggle to put into words is why I believe in the existence of but one God. I wasn't raised to believe in Him. At a superficial level, I actually tend to prefer to think as an atheist. I'm definitely a great big sinner by the standards of many religious creeds. But believe I do, and I think, at this moments, I may actually have the words. Hopefully I can get them down before they fly from my mind yet again.

Suppose you were an engineer, and you came across a functioning device of unknown origin. You spent many years studying this device, seeing how all the parts go together, determining the principles by which it operates. However, the one thing you could not get a look at no matter how hard you tried was the power source. The device was clearly self propelling, but the power by which it operates was, for whatever reason, hidden from view. You'd diagrammed the entire thing, but at the heart of the diagram was an empty spot simply labeled "phlebotinum device". No other configuration seemed workable, and any other model you could come up with required a lot of arbitrary adjustments to even function, a bit like the Ptolomeic model of the solar system. In a situation like this, it would be foolish to debate the semantics of what the device should be called, or the existence of the device.

For me, the field is moral philosophy. No, I am not formally trained, but the majority of my life has been spent musing on the subject, whether I believed in God's existence at the time or not. To me, one of the primary functions of scientific thinking is to discover the order in a seemingly chaotic mixture of facts. And so far as I could tell, notions of right and wrong were only questions of seeming, and could not be justified according to any ultimate principle or structure of thought. Ultimately, right and wrong were purely matters of either futile and circular reasonings, or assertion.

And nobody asserts that more than the more traditional, less thoughtful believers... but ironically, the time I spent trying my best to be as religious as possible, attending church and reordering my thoughts to account for His existence, brought a spark of order to all these chaotic musings. For though in the short term, submission to a written code and a social order (so far as I was able... I've never been good at submitting to social order) brought me a brief reprieve from my own crisis of morality, in the long term, the "God" principle became the "phlebotinum device" at the core of my own moral structure.

(Note that I recognize that this "God principle" is not God himself, but rather a memetic structure that fits into the only consistent memetic structure I have ever run across. I do not worship this principle; that would be idolatrous. Indeed, I do not ordinarily worship, unless my wonder at the brief flashes of insight this principle enables me to have counts. I say this not to brag, but more as a confession.)

What is this structure? Hopefully I can elaborate on this further in future entries, but there are a few platitudes that I regard as being more true than false, that point to the existence of some benevolant guiding force.

For example, "leave the rest up to God," or "Matters beyond that will attend themselves." It is, I believe, a fact that there are limits to individual responsibility. One simply does not have the power to order the entire world around him... but there are so many who drive themselves to the grave attempting to do so. Worry worry worry... but it isn't even necessary. For the world is not a dark place with potential enemies around every corner... unless you have made those enemies yourself. One CAN focus his attention on that which is within one's own power without worring about sudden unexpected disaster... and be more effective at life as a result. For though sudden unexpected disaster does strike from time to time, worrying about it accomplishes nothing. And afer a natural disaster, or "act of god", the key to moving on is acceptance of the situation, "trusting God", not howling at the arbitrary and senseless nature of the universe.

What is the engine that enables "matters" to "attend themselves"? One can suppose an inherent benevolance of humankind... this is not, in my opinion, a reasonable supposition. One can throw up his hands and simply say "I don't know." I don't know either, but the first phrase I quoted suggests something that is true...

What is the mind that guides the "invidible hand" that guides the distribution of resources? How are the species that survive amid extinctions on the one hand, and the social and moral systems that continue to the present day, selected? Is the chain of cause and effect infinite, with no original cause? Or is there a "base" cause from which all effects arise... and what is that "first cause"? What is the equation behind the fractal pattern that seems to emerge in such disparate places in nature? And why does it always seem to function, at the macro level, better than any human planner?

What is it that made Jews and Jewishness indestructable? What is it about the cult of YHWH that was so compelling it spawned two world religions, and numerous other ofshoots? What was it that drove Jesus to knowingly and willingly approach the cross? Which is less reasonable: to entertain the notion that the old prophets may have known something (or someone) we do not, or to valiantly squeeze one's eyes from even the possibility (whatever you think of the old religions) that the ordering of the universe has a conscious intent behind it?

To me, human morality simply does not make sense without a "God principle" at the center.